Anne Schuchat, MD resigning as principal deputy director of CDC/

I do not know how the CDC operates. But I have been watching Anne Schuchat for over 20 years, since she was chosen to provide CDC’s testimony to Congress about the anthrax vaccine.  She is quick on her feet, she is a good liar, she is now the highest career official at CDC, and she probably controls a great deal of what goes on there.

When Rochelle Walensky wrote a NY Times opinion piece about the fact that she would not lie to the public, she mentioned Anne Schuchat.  And I wondered then if the opinion piece was Schuchat’s idea.  It was a gratuitous stab at Trump, but it was also making a promise that CDC was unlikely to keep. And I wondered if Schuchat was setting up Walensky to fail. Because CDC always lies to the public. Just go to their website and see if you can find a single statistic that was not “modelled;” well, there are a few.  But mostly you cannot get a straight answer about anything from this agency. Nor have they competently managed a single crisis, such as the 1976 and 2009 Swine flu, Ebola, Zika and SARS-2 pandemics. [The 1976 pandemic didn’t even happen, but they vaccinated against it anyway.]

In the 4 short months that Walensky has directed CDC, she has regularly stepped in dog doo.  She spouts her CDC talking points as earnestly as she can, and then they turn out to be wrong. The latest was the change in masking guidance over the past few days.  Walensky was asked on the talk shows this weekend why she told Congress one thing and 2 days later announced the opposite. The next day, she announced Schuchat’s retirement.

I kept wondering, each time Walensky had to eat crow, was Schuchat setting her up? Would Walensky realize it? And today I got my answer. 

Nancy Messonier, MD was another political agent masquerading as a doctor at CDC, and her last day was Friday. Walensky did a good job eliminating these two. She may have to look outside the agency, however, if she wants truthful and thoughtful managers, because the CDC culture has been so corrupted.

Of course, all this is guess work. What do I know? But if I was Walensky, I would send Schuchat on a long vacation right now, before she could do any more damage.

Here’s an excerpt from Walensky’s NYT opinion piece from January 11, which happened to be the peak of the Covid pandemic:

As the New C.D.C. Chief, I’ll Tell You the Truth

… On Jan. 20, I will begin leading the C.D.C., which was founded in 1946 to meet precisely the kinds of challenges posed by this pandemic. I agreed to serve as C.D.C. director because I believe in the agency’s mission and commitment to knowledge, statistics and guidance. I will do so by leading with facts, science and integrity — and being accountable for them, as the C.D.C. has done since its founding 75 years ago.

I acknowledge that our team of scientists will have to work very hard to restore public trust in the C.D.C., at home and abroad, because it has been undermined over the last year. In that time, numerous reports stated that White House officials interfered with official guidance issued by the C.D.C…

As C.D.C. director, I will be responsible for making sure that the public trusts the agency’s guidance and that its staff feels supported. On my first day, I will ask Anne Schuchat, the principal deputy director, with 32 years of experience at the C.D.C., to begin a comprehensive review to ensure that all existing guidance related to Covid-19 is evidence-based and free of politics… Restoring the public’s trust in the C.D.C. is crucial…

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Schuchat is military; Rear Admiral, US Navy.

CDC began as military operation — Communicable Disease Center: with the military man and also MD, Dr. Joseph Mountin, its founding father.

Check out the military's role in 'vaccination' push, now, latest is beyond any rational notions of human decency, never mind "informed consent." The military setting up shop on sidewalks near Texas bars frequented by youth:

https://youtu.be/hf1k8Z92yvw

Walensky is "perfect" for this job: a coward, unable to communicate the function and purpose of actual science, and compromised. She is a warm body sitting in a big chair, with no oars in the water.

Dr. Patsy.

And just reshuffled some deck chairs on the Titanic as it were.

She as poisonous as Fauci, and whether as evil remain to be seen; Fauci has a forty years record of moral turpitude head-start.

On Herd Immunity: She drank the Kool Aid of fakery on what until 15 months ago was boilerplate and universally understood.

Herd Immunity ends a virus; vaccination can speed up the road to herd immunity.

But in the Brave New Build Back Better World of which Walensky is a most prominent . . . : the new faux science is: vaccines bring herd immunity.

Walensky is worse than a Heroin Dealer; she is a scourge on humanity.

How many youth is she now trying to murder and maim — on orders from the Military?

From the MD that wants to speak the truth, please don't laugh out loud at this "fact sheet" published May 12, 2021 [all which are not facts and all of which are in dispute].

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Meryl, taking your comments a step further, I believe the WHO/FDA/CDC/NIH/NIAID are ALL liars.
So, Rochelle Walensky and her self-professed honesty will be quickly put to the test.

The consensus view across the USA is that Covid19 is a bioweapon – paid for by the US government.
Based on the actions of Gates & Fauci, many believe it was developed with the specific intent of being
released. After first appearing around Ft. Detrick’s bioweapons lab, it showed up later in Wuhan –
and quickly the lab leak story had legs – and then it quickly appeared in Iran.

We do have laws. And under our laws, “mRNA” technology can NEVER give rise to a vaccine as
defined in those laws. A gene-editing procedure that inserts a synthetic mRNA “product” into your body,
does not meet the definition of a vaccine, as described in the enabling legislation. Synthetic mRNA
is a medical device/product – there is a warranty. The manufacturers are liable for damages to the
recipient, as well as anyone else damaged by the installation of the device/product into the recipient.

Further, this mRNA technology, like the mRNA based Covid itself, works much like a Pharma bioweapon.
Unvaccinated people are being damaged by the very dangerous spike protein created by the synthetic
mRNA installed in the vaccinated population. Like a bioweapon, the vaccinated are spreading the
dangerous spike protein where ever they go. This collateral damage is being reported everywhere.
And they may spread it forever as there is no off button – other than their death – that will stop the creation of the spike protein. The Gates & Fauci bioweapon 2.0.

However, the jig is up on this. Experts are now speaking out. This is going to get really ugly, really fast.
Will Rochelle Walensky, and all the others in the know, have the strength of their convictions?

Bup
Bup
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Yep, there is some evidence that this was a biowarfare attack by rogue elements of the deep state against China and Iran:

https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-coronavirus-catastrophe-as-biowarfare-blowback/

Meryl Nass, M.D.
Meryl Nass, M.D.
1 year ago

"There is currently no evidence that COVID-19 vaccination causes any problems with pregnancy, including the development of the placenta. In addition, there is no evidence that fertility problems are a side effect of any vaccine, including COVID-19 vaccines." thanks to anon #1 above, I can guarantee that this is false.

No evidence it harms pregnancy? well, just look at VAERS. Plenty of pregnancy losses reported. Or the other 10 databases that CDC keeps hidden–do any of them show it is safe in pregnancy? They are the ones necessary to show the post-vaccination pregnancy loss is no greater than baseline losses. But CDC has not trotted out any of those data to demonstrate safety.

Why did Walensky have to walk back her comments on safety in pregnancy a few weeks ago?

And finally, plenty of vaccines have been shown to be dangerous in pregnancy. Has CDC forgotten that rubella vaccines causes birth defects? All live vaccines are contraindicated in pregnancy. And as far as the two that are recommended in pregnancy, flu and DTP, read the labels: neither of the labels claim they are safe in pregnancy.

CDC pulled that claim out of its hat, data-free, as so often happens.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

"There is no evidence".
Translation:
"It will take years to look at and analyze statistical data. Passing time will enable us to tweak those data further, like destroying placebo groups. When/if someone will come up with real conclusions, all people responsible have long gone."

They are professional liars.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

As of May 18, 2021, according to CDC "VAERS received 4,647 reports of death" following COVID-19 shots.

From 1990 to 2020, VAERS reported a total of 4,887 deaths from all vaccinations.

In less than five months, we have approached same number of after covid vax deaths that it took 31 years "to achieve" previously.

[[Over 273 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through May 17, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 4,647 reports of death (0.0017%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA physicians review each case report of death as soon as notified and CDC requests medical records to further assess reports. A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines. However, recent reports indicate a plausible causal relationship between the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and a rare and serious adverse event—blood clots with low platelets—which has caused deaths. Get the latest safety information on the J&J/Janssen vaccine. CDC and FDA will continue to investigate reports of adverse events, including deaths, reported to VAERS.]]

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html

Proper analysis would compare the (0.0017%) with the percentage total number vaccinated in previous 31 years; in which case the (0.0017%) is 500 times more than compared to all flu shot deaths and about 100 times higher than all vaccinations, combined.

Scroll to Top