Because no animal reservoir has been found for SARS-CoV-2, it cannot properly be termed a zoonosis.* Should we call it a labnosis? And what does that mean?

Because no animal reservoir has been found for SARS-CoV-2, it cannot properly be termed a zoonosis.* Should we call it a labnosis? And what does that mean?

After a year and a half of seeking but not finding SARS-2 in any wildlife anywhere (apart from domesticated or zoo animals that appear to have caught it from humans) is it time to say, yes, it didn’t just escape from a lab?  It was created, built, assembled in a lab. Or more probably, many labs.

Coronavirus scientists have been constructing new viruses out of bits and pieces of other viruses for a long time.

Why did they do it?

One answer is that it was relatively easy to do.  Easier than for many other viruses.  Scientists like to tinker.

Okay, but after the SARS-1 outbreak in 2002-3, and a series of SARS-1 lab leaks over the ensuing several years in China, Taiwan and Singapore, which killed a few people, especially lab workers, didn’t scientists know it was dangerous to do this?

SARS viruses were designated by the US government as “Select Agents,” meaning they had the potential to cause a deadly pandemic and/or severe economic damage to crops or livestock.  Scientists had to handle them in special ways, and get permission to transfer or share them with other labs.  Scientists working on SARS coronaviruses had to have been aware of the risks in what they were working on.

I previously cited a statistic from STAT.  The statistic is that Fauci’s NIAID has been funding coronavirus research for over twenty years, and at a price of up to $51 million per year, pre-Covid.  Until 2002, everyone thought that the worst thing coronaviruses did to humans was cause colds:  10-30% of all colds.  NIAID doesn’t spend money on colds.

Coronaviruses do cause animal diseases.  But still, animal diseases are not in NIAID’s bailiwick.  USDA funds research on them.

Some coronavirus research made sense, such as the 2005 CDC study that showed chloroquine killed SARS-1 at achievable human doses, in the test tube.  Or the 2014 NIAID study that showed chloroquine killed MERS.

But no new drugs or vaccines came out of the hundreds of millions of dollars in coronavirus research sponsored by NIAID.  And when Covid hit, Fauci and his NIAID hid information on the drugs they had found to be effective against coronaviruses in the lab.

So, what were Fauci and NIAID actually doing with all the coronavirus research?  What were they looking for?

It seems they were remarkably successful in creating new chimeric, pathogenic coronaviruses.  But they buried the research on effective treatments.

Americans need to ask, what in heaven’s name were Fauci and his masters trying to accomplish?  Who are his masters?  And what other deadly viruses have they created, with or without their friends in Wuhan?

We need to know what they heck they were doing.  What did these programs create?  Why did these programs exist?  Is anyone in media asking these questions?

We need to know now, before the fear of the variants wears off, and people refuse the lockdowns and any more vaccines.  Who knows–that could be the trigger for the next dangerous bug to be unleashed.


Other than circumstantial evidence of zoonotic cases in mink farms in the Netherlands, no cases of natural transmission from wild or domesticated animals have been confirmed. More than 40 million human COVID-19 infections reported appear to be exclusively through human-human transmission. SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 do not meet the WHO definition of zoonoses. We suggest SARS-CoV-2 should be re-classified as an EID of probable animal origin.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scroll to Top