COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed/ Reuters

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/covid-vaccine-injury-claims-mount-recourse-is-lacking-those-harmed-2021-10-19/

(Reuters) – As the Biden administration puts the final touches on an emergency COVID-19 vaccine mandate for companies with 100 or more employees, a crucial piece seems to be missing for the unlucky few who experience serious side effects: meaningful legal recourse.

More than 1,300 COVID vaccine-related injury claims are now pending before an obscure government tribunal, which to date has decided only two such cases, one involving swelling of the tongue and throat following the jab, the other alleging long-lasting, severe shoulder pain.

In both instances, the government, which requires claimants to prove their injuries are “the direct result” of a COVID-19 vaccine, denied compensation.

It’s a steep burden of proof. Lawyers tell me the vaccine is so new that there’s virtually no definitive research on injury causation to cite.

Indeed, the overwhelming majority of all litigants under what’s known as the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program have not succeeded. According to program data, 29 claims have been paid for injuries stemming from other vaccines since the tribunal’s inception in 2010. (Ten additional claims won approval but no compensation.) The other 455 claims – 92% – were denied or otherwise deemed ineligible for review…

Not a single COVID vaccine injury claim has been paid by the program, and the statute of limitations for filing claims is a miserable one year. So how do you get the evidence to prove your claim when it does not yet exist? 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

After Nazi Germany and the Holocaust, The World Leaders created the Nuremberg Code(1947) and Helsinki Declaration(1964). Both of them vehemently PROTECT THE PEOPLE.

According to the Declaration of Helsinki:

Knowledge Cannot Trample Rights

The purpose of medical research is to generate new knowledge to better understand the causes, development, and effects of diseases as well as to improve both diagnosis and treatment. According to the Declaration of Helsinki, “This goal can never take precedence over the rights and interests of individual research subjects.” Physicians involved in medical research must protect:

Life
Health
Dignity
Integrity
Right to self-determination (autonomy)
Privacy
Confidentiality of personal information

So while these monsters are busy trampling the rights of everyone on this planet, they MUST be brought to justice for blatant ethical and criminal usurpation of everyone's inherent rights.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Let's look at the United States Code. At the sections which discuss "emergency use authorization." (10 USC §1107a, 21 USC §360bbb-3a)

Legislation which states, in no uncertain terms, that you must be informed that the medication has not been tested for safety and efficacy and has not been approved. (Which is true.) That you must be informed of all reported negative consequences. You may either "give voluntary, informed consent," or may refuse. You may not be penalized for your decision. You don't have to give a reason. You don't have to ask for exemption. You don't ask: "Father, may I?"

"Mandates," and all other forms of coercion, are "expressly illegal."

If this so-called "law" does not mean anything to me, then why did they write it?

Look – I have no idea how much money Big Pharma paid to governments around the world with regard to "enabling all of them to pursue their present Fascist future plans," and I really don't care. The only thing that matters to me is my body, and my ability to protect my life from things that I reasonably fear might shorten it.

The plain text of the law agrees with my interpretation: "My body is my own. Inviolate. Sacresanct."

So – never mind the Constitution – does "the United States Code" protect me, or not?

Scroll to Top