In the UK, children will not be vaccinated for Covid unless at extremely high risk

 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/07/17/children-will-get-covid-vaccines-vulnerable/

Children will only get Covid vaccines if vulnerable

Ministers decide against mass vaccination for teenagers on advice of scientists

ByEdward Malnick,  SUNDAY POLITICAL EDITOR17 July 2021 • 9:00pm

Britain has opted against mass Covid vaccinations for all children and teenagers, with ministers instead preparing to offer jabs to vulnerable 12 to 15-year-olds and those about to turn 18, The Telegraph can disclose.

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) is believed to have advised ministers against the rollout of vaccines to all children until further evidence on the risks is available.

Instead, under guidance due to be issued on Monday, jabs will be offered to children between 12 and 15 who are deemed vulnerable to Covid or who live with adults who are immunosuppressed or otherwise vulnerable to the virus.  They will also now be offered to all 17-year-olds within three months of their 18th birthday.

The move is at odds with decisions taken in countries such as the US, Israel and France, where children over the age of 12 are being routinely vaccinated.

Teaching unions had pushed for all young people to be offered a vaccine to protect them against serious illness from Covid and to help minimise further disruption to education after three lockdowns.

However, the JCVI’s advice is expected to echo recommendations by Germany’s vaccine commission, Stiko, which said last month that only children with pre-existing conditions should be given a Covid jab.

Ministers are preparing to announce the move after months of deliberation by the JCVI. A source said the committee would keep the possibility of vaccinating all children “under review”. Patients’ groups and MPs were briefed on the plans by Nadhim Zahawi, the vaccines minister, last week.

The disclosure comes ahead of the lifting of many Covid restrictions on Monday and as the Department of Health announced that every adult in the UK had now been offered a first dose of a vaccine – ahead of Boris Johnson’s target date of July 19. 

More than two-thirds (68 per cent) of adults have now received two doses. Officials said that every adult now had the opportunity to have both by mid-September.

The NHS is now preparing to roll out the vaccine imminently to 12 to 15-year-olds with underlying health conditions and those living with vulnerable adults.

They will be offered the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which was approved for use in children aged 12 to 15 by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency last month after a “rigorous review”.

On Saturday, Prof Sarah Gilbert, one of the scientists behind the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine said the benefits of vaccinating children were “much lower and poorer” than inoculating adults. 

She added: “With still a limited number of doses available to vaccinate the world, we should be use those doses for healthcare workers and for older individuals in countries that don’t yet have a vaccine.” 

The UK decision is understood to have been made based on a “risk-benefit” analysis based on protecting children rather than a calculation taking into account excess supplies that the country could ship for use in adults abroad.

Teenagers aged 16 who are deemed vulnerable to Covid are already eligible for vaccines as part of group six of the vaccine rollout, which applies to adults aged 16 to 65 in an “at-risk group”.

Those aged 16-65 deemed to be at risk include patients with blood cancer, diabetes, severe asthma, kidney disease and lowered immunity due to disease or treatment.

An NHS spokesman said: “Since the start of the NHS Covid vaccination programme, the biggest and most successful in NHS history, the NHS has followed JCVI guidance on delivering vaccinations to the population in England.

“If the JCVI updates its guidance, the NHS will act swiftly to reflect any changes and will continue to deliver Covid jabs to those eligible as quickly as possible, as it has done after previous updates.”

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

New UK Study: People Who Have Been Vaccinated Make Up 47% of New COVID Cases!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/new-uk-study-people-vaccinated-make-47-new-covid-cases/

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

1.) New Study Links Ivermectin To "Large Reductions" In COVID-19 Deaths!
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/new-study-links-ivermectin-large-reductions-covid-19-deaths
2.) Indonesia Regulator Allows Ivermectin Use For Covid Treatment.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/indonesia-regulator-allows-ivermectin-use-covid-treatment

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Wife almost died from DVT Blood Clots, know the Early Symptoms!
1.) Dr. Charles Hoffe: 'D-Dimer Blood Tests Showing Blood Clots After COVID Vaccination', “These Shots Are Causing Permanent Damage and the Worst Is Yet to Come.”
https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=61749
2.) The Most-Vaccinated Countries Experiencing Surge in COVID-19 Cases, While the Least-Vaccinated Countries Are Not?
https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=61787
3.) NIH COVID-19 Panel Member 'Received Massive Windfall from Ivermectin Non-Recommendation'!
About two months after the NIH meeting on ivermectin, the NIH announced the award NOT-TR-21–024; funding of ACTIV-6 to study the use of repurposed drugs in COVID-19. Duke University was the only institution in the country that met the criteria for the study, according to the NIH. Funding was thus distributed on a sole source basis. The “initial investment” in the trial was later announced to be '$155 million'. The principal investigator of the trial was not identified initially but, in a later announcement, was identified to be 'Susanna Naggie', who is also a member of the 'NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel'. (Imagine That? how many lives could have Ivermectin saved?)
https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=61772

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

MRNA Vaccine Inventor Says To Stop COVID “Vaccines” Now!
https://www.naturalblaze.com/2021/06/mrna-inventor-says-to-stop-covid-vaccines-now.html

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

DR.JANE RUBY: INJECTED PROOF! WHAT THE VAX DOES TO BLOOD.
https://thephaser.com/2021/07/dr-jane-ruby-injected-proof-what-the-vax-does-to-blood/

Linda
Linda
1 year ago

Meryl,

What do you make of all the data (and annoying headlines) that all the deaths are happening in the unvaccinated areas?

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-health-941fcf43d9731c76c16e7354f5d5e187

It doesn't make sense. Are theses vaxes working better than you and I expected? They seem to be bringing down deaths in the vulnerable/elderly and ones at high risk. Chicago and LA and other cities show all the areas with the highest amounts of deaths are also areas of the highest rates of the unvaccinated. Unless I'm missing something here.

Thanks for all you do.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

CDC whistleblowers say 'covid vaccines' have already 'killed 50,000 Americans'!
We are just Road Kill to them?
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-14-cdc-whistleblowers-covid-vaccines-killed-50000-americans.html

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

I too read the Associated Press AP story at

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-health-941fcf43d9731c76c16e7354f5d5e187

Which states at the bottom copy:

"This story was first published on June 24, 2021. It was updated on June 29, 2021, to correct the number of hospital admissions to more than 107,000, not 853,000, and the percentage of hospitalized people who been vaccinated to 1.1%, not 0.1%."

And I too have been in the news business for decades.

As you can see with your own eyes, the AP has no idea what they are talking about.

Five days after publishing false information, by a factor of about 10 times, they got around to "updating" their lying.

AP has the resources to hire and be informed by those skilled in the science of data, as do the CDC, WHO, NIH, NIAID, NYTimes, etc.

As do all members of congress.

They don't want to know; otherwise all stories would be informed by those skilled in the science of data.

It is one thing for the tech giants/censors to say this and that is mis or dis information; it is another thing entirely to have information that is persnickety.

The big censors are persnickety about eliminating information that is persnickety about using parameters to actually inform the public.

Absent this, narratives and propaganda are running as free and wild as their case counts, death counts and there is zero accountability for these ongoing sins of omission.

Instead, we are given numbers with out context and in particular, with no parameters from which to draw any rational conclusions.

This is called building a narrative; or propaganda if you prefer.

The snippet at bottom of AP story epitomize what is going on, and is not even the worst of that story's major problems and biases from a journalistic paradigm.

Prior to March 2020, I could count on one hand with fingers left over how many of my stories were spiked.

Since then, I've run out of fingers using both hands.

This AP story made zero effort to provide a picture of what is currently happening.

[[ Andy Slavitt, a former adviser to the Biden administration on COVID-19, suggested that 98% to 99% of the Americans dying of the coronavirus are unvaccinated.]], AP story reports.

What the hell is this — based on what?

Yet this is basis for headline and lede sentence.

By March 2020 China reported 0.9% covid deaths were in those with no other symptoms.

In June 2020 the CDC said 7% of covid deaths occurred in those with no other symptoms; by August that proportion dropped to 6%.

In Massachusetts last summer it was 2%; it is now 0.88%

According to research published this month at CDC.GOV, titled: "Underlying Medical Conditions and Severe Illness Among 540,667 Adults HospitalizedWith COVID-19" — this proportion in the US is 0.9%.

https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2021/pdf/21_0123.pdf

This research found 25% of all covid deaths occurred in thos with more than 10 co-morbidities; and that 64% occurred in those with at least 6.

And that 77% of deaths were those 65 and older — with 95% of all 'covid' deaths those 50 and older.
-30-

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

PS
China reports 3 deaths per 1 million people; the USA and the NATO country, 1K deaths per 1 million, give or take.

Vietnam reports 0.5 deaths per 1M people.

Vietnam and China from the beginning as societies immediately had prophylactics in place to prevent people from needing hospital, and from dying unnecessarily.

In other words, those societies believed it was important to prevent suffering and to try and cure the ill, the sooner, the better.

The West, in contrast, well, form your own conclusions at this point.

The death rate reported in the West compared to Vietnam is 2,000 time higher, or 200,000% higher; compared to China, 333 times higher, or 33,300% greater.

How often is this boilerplate data blasted on the NYTimes, AP, the CDC updates, or the vax-pushing big Tech crony's platforms?

This is called putting an issue into perspective, it is using known parameters to put into perspective reality.

Walensky, whatever she may have been at Mass General, is now operating on the basis of make believe — make believe you don't see what the facts are, in other words.

Fauci, a very sick man, has no oars in the water.

And these criminals et al. are in charge of our public health system in Uncle Samsville USA.

Wait until we get all the data, someday, that shows just how many women that got the shot are permanently sterilized — and though they may still be able to conceive, cannot bring their babies to term!

Heaven Help Us.
-30-

Scroll to Top