Pfizer CEO: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any. 3 doses with a booster offer reasonable protection against hospitalization and deaths. Less protection against infection.” 39 secs

Jordan Schactel has presented Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla’s statement to media yesterday, which is otherwise behind a paywall.  

The statement is critically important for the Supreme Court mandate cases, because both the OSHA case and healthcare worker case require only the first two vaccinations (“fully vaccinated”).  Veterinarian Bourla admits these 2 doses provide “very limited protection, if any.”  Even a third dose, he implicitly acknowledges, does not prevent infection and transmission.

Given that the CEO of the manufacturer of the most-administered COVID vaccines in the US  admits his vaccine does not prevent spread, it is hard to see how the Supreme Court could uphold the mandates.  It is hard to see how any mandates could stand up.

Bourla knows what he is doing, which is presumably to help sell his newer products, or to get ahead of other bad news–such as, perhaps, negative vaccine efficacy.

This should have been front page news yesterday, but instead it is hard to find. Wondering why.

https://dossier.substack.com/p/shock-video-pfizer-ceo-says-current

UPDATE:  Alex Berenson goes into this more deeply, thinking some similar thoughts as I.  His report ends:

So the prudent move for Albert Bourla, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, PhD., is to begin to tamp expectations for vaccines, slow-walk more boosters, and hope that Omicron does his job for him. His biggest problem is probably that the public health authorities are a lot stupider than he is and continue to push boosters.

I’d love to know what Pfizer is telling them privately. I’m gonna guess it’s not in email, though.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/if-you-are-a-vaccine-company-executive

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
6 months ago

Or he's signaling the goal posts should/will be moved yet again. That the two injections are no longer sufficient to be considered "vaccinated". Instead, the edicts must now include an endless regime of "boosters".

Anonymous
Anonymous
6 months ago

What is the context for Bouria? The quotation doesn't say "Covid-19" vaccine! Elsewhere, another is suggested.

We need to be careful, not jumping on quotes because we like its political implications. Please research first.

Anonymous
Anonymous
6 months ago

1.) Project Veritas: Never Before Seen Military Documents About Gain-of-Function Research Contradict Dr. Fauci Testimony Under Oath (VIDEO)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/project-veritas-never-seen-military-documents-gain-function-research-contradict-dr-fauci-testimony-oath-video/

2.) 'JUST IN:' New FOIA by US Right to Know Reveals Fauci-Funded EcoHealth Alliance Attempted to Hide Their Role In Developing The Virus.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/just-new-foia-us-right-know-reveals-fauci-funded-ecohealth-alliance-attempted-hide-role-developing-virus/

3.) BREAKING: House GOP Oversight Members Release Emails of Fauci and NIH Officials 'Concealing Information' on 'Wuhan Lab Leak Theory from the American Public'.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/breaking-house-gop-oversight-members-release-emails-fauci-nih-officials-concealing-information-wuhan-lab-leak-theory-american-public/

Anonymous
Anonymous
6 months ago

Question if two doses doesn't offer any or limited protection, why would the half dose booster offer any if just got 2nd dose last week? Presuming when and if so also indicating perhaps subtly lacks efficacy?

Jan 10, Pfizer CEO: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any. “

Scroll to Top