Samuel Alito’s draft of a decision overturning Roe v Wade is leaked

1.  What case would allow this Court to overturn an earlier Court?  On what basis?  Is there a case the court accepted to which this decision is attached?  (I have not looked.)

2.  Since there is a long draft (about 100 pages), does that mean the members of the Court have already voted?

3.  The release of this draft will almost certainly result in stopping such a decision, as it is so unpopular among women.

4.  Were a decision to overturn Roe v Wade to be announced, that would shift many millions of votes in the midterm from Republicans to Democrats.  It could allow the Dems to retain control of both houses of Congress.

5.  Is the Supreme Court review of Roe v Wade then in fact a Deep State operation to maintain legislative power with the Dems to more easily allow the Great Reset to go forward?

I am wondering what others think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
23 days ago

Seems to be yet another tizzy-inducing psy-op of mass distraction. The irony and hypocrisy in all this, those most vocal champions of "my body my choice" are exactly those most shrill supporters of government edicts enforcing the jab — without regard to personal choice — without regard to the parental perogative of protecting their children.

Dr. Nass, in your travels and through your networking, are you aware of any countries in the world that might yet be sane and rational and free and healthy enough to consider a relocation? Thinking it may be time for a post-retirement transition, while there's still a chance…

ML
ML
23 days ago

I think you are spot-on, Meryl. This was leaked to prevent the massive hemorrhaging of voters who have left the Dem party over the last couple years in particular, myself included. I hope it doesn’t work, but people are passionate about this issue on both sides. I’ve never had a problem with first trimester abortion. After that, the medical, legal, and deterministic issues come into play much more sharply. One thing I know for sure is that abortions will always happen, whether they are safe and legal or not. Many moons ago, I was an L and D nurse in a busy inner city hospital, delivering 800+ babies a month. Most lay people have no clue at all of the many medical issues that can occur during a second or third trimester loss. It’s a complex issue and doesn’t comport with an easy answer.

Anonymous
Anonymous
23 days ago

Answering question: who leaked it is of a different caliber from consequences of leak, and those motives — keeping in mind CIA admits to spying on Congress; Obama's NSA got caught spying on Merkel; Durham has shown same spied on Trump, et. al. and Snowden showed everything is captured and we're all spied on, all our emails, phone messages, everything online, recorded by US Government.

Thus, a large pool [more than a million] of potential 'who dunnit' 'suspects' have access to and perform this work capturing stuff.

According to Politico, May 2: [POLITICO received a copy of the draft opinion from a person familiar with the court’s proceedings in the Mississippi case along with other details supporting the authenticity of the document.]

If true, assuming it actually came from 'a person familiar' — and this, a very big if — this is saying pool is:
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr
and by order of seniority:
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas, 1991
Stephen Breyer, 1994
Samuel Alito, 2006
Sonia Sotomayor, 2009
Elena Kagan, 2010
Neil Gorsuch, 2017
Brett Kavanaugh, 2018
Amy Coney Barrett, 2020.

This nine and their aids and clerks, anyone inside.

And outside the Court 'familiar with the court’s proceedings in the Mississippi case.' This include aforementioned large pool [more than a million] of potential 'who dunnit' 'suspects' that perform work capturing stuff and are 'familiar with the court’s proceedings in the Mississippi case', at least, this is Politico's narrative.

This brings us to two possibilities:
1] someone inside court system leaked it, the smaller pool; or 2] someone outside court system, the larger pool.

Irrespective of 1] or 2], it can be argued, to put it stark and clearly: this event destroyed whatever legitimacy Supreme Court as an institution may still have 'enjoyed'.

Which, by definition, lead to greater tyranny, therefore.

However, official response of Supreme Court, via Roberts, for reasons others may comment on: completely fails to recognize this consequence, destruction of the court, and all courts, as an institution in US.

Roberts, in fact, pretends that there is no damage, saying: "the Court will not be affected in any way."

Why sputter such nonsense, as the Titanic is sinking, as it were?

His response, this lie, implicates him, as I see it.

Roberts' decision directing "the Marshal of the Court to launch an investigation into the source of the leak" adds more sick humor.

Framing this as merely "a singular and egregious breach" is either being in La La Land, or a statement of a cover up of the actual consequences of this event.

What we are seeing, on the third day on this THIRD RAIL: scant to non-existent conversations among our "lords and masters" and their agents in big tech and big media and big government that go to the heart of matter: destruction, the breaking of the courts legitimacy.

This 'looking the other way' has to be on purpose.

Others should comment on why 'looking the other way' on purpose.

In other words: Titanic is sinking — and yet we won't 'be affected in any way'!

Instead of working together to save ourselves from inevitable doom, this wonderfully orchestrated Cover Story has us, in this sinking ship: fighting each other — over Roe v. Wade, among most divisive political issues in modern America. Big Tech and Big Media, agents of our lords and masters, are making hay out of fact we're fighting each other, instead of working together to save ourselves from drowning in more tyranny.

The 'beauty' of all this: there is nothing illegal about leaking that document.

Irrespective of who is 'right' / 'wrong' here, principle of bodily autonomy enshrined in Roe decision already Gone With The Wind: with Covid-19 forced vaccine mandates for people to keep their jobs, go to college, be in public, imposition of slave passports, etc.
-30-

Bette Solomon
Bette Solomon
21 days ago

Coincidentally protestors and printed signs were already available.

Scroll to Top