WHO mulls reforms to repair reputation after bungling Ebola; must guard against donor fatigue/ AP, BBC, Businessweek


From the AP:

GENEVA — The World Health Organization is debating how to reform itself after
botching the response to the Ebola outbreak, a sluggish performance that
experts say cost thousands of lives.

On Sunday, WHO’s
executive board planned to discuss proposals that could radically transform the
United Nations health agency in response to sharp criticism over its handling
of the West Africa epidemic. 

“The Ebola
outbreak points to the need for urgent change,” said Dr. Margaret Chan,
WHO’s director-general. She acknowledged that WHO was too slow to grasp the
significance of the Ebola outbreak, which is estimated to have killed more than
8,600 people, mainly in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone.

Critics say the kinds
of reform being debated are long overdue.    

“The groundswell
of dissatisfaction and lack of trust in WHO over Ebola has reached such a
crescendo that unless there is fundamental reform, I think we might lose
confidence in WHO for a generation,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the
WHO Collaborating Center on Public Health Law and Human Rights at Georgetown
University…

But fear not.  WHO already has the solution: send money. From Bloomberg
Businessweek:

The World Health
Organization proposed creating a special fund
to respond to outbreaks such as Ebola and the establishment of a global health
emergency workforce after the organization acknowledged mis-steps in its
response to the epidemic.    

The WHO’s executive
board agreed “in principle” to establish a contingency fund in a draft
resolution at a meeting in Geneva Sunday. Director General Margaret Chan should
take “immediate steps” to establish a public-health reserve workforce that can
be promptly deployed in response to health emergencies, the board said.    

The WHO was too slow
to respond to the Ebola outbreak, which it says has killed 8,675 people in
Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea. The epidemic highlights the need for “urgent
change” at the United Nations agency, Chan said in opening remarks to the board
meeting.     

The WHO “did not have
the systems and capacities in place to respond to a health emergency that was
both severe and sustained,” Chan said…

But why did WHO deny Ebola was a major problem for 3 months after it had been notified of the outbreak? Isn’t that the biggest problem for WHO to understand and fix, wrt future outbreaks, both at WHO offices in Africa and Geneva? 


Ebola appears to be halting, and the West doesn’t even know why. This is something WHO ought to be on top of, since it signifies major gaps in understanding of Ebola spreads, and appears now to be controlled by nature!  (Are the bulk of exposed but unaffected Africans immune from inapparent infections?  Are they genetically protected?)


But instead of focusing on why the epidemic rapidly flared and as rapidly is extinguishing, WHO has other concerns, like the dreaded donor fatigue. From BBC:

…Liberia announced on Friday that it was down to just five confirmed (Ebola) cases – there were 500 a week in September. Guinea and Sierra Leone have both also experienced falls in infection rates.

Dr Chan said the worst-case scenario had been avoided, but warned: “We must maintain the momentum and guard against complacency and donor fatigue.”

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scroll to Top