Why? This will be another Living List. Please send additions.

 1.  Why did all of the vaccines chosen for Operation Warp Speed use novel technologies, unused in any routine vaccines?  (Yes, a new Ebola vaccine uses an adenovirus vector, and a resurfaced military-only adenovirus vaccine uses one too–but that’s all.)  Why wasn’t a method with a proven track record chosen for the largest vaccine program in the history of the world?

2.  Why did all 4 of the initial vaccines selected for development in Operation Warp Speed (Moderna, Pfizer, J and J/Janssen and Astra-Zeneca) rely on using RNA or DNA?

3.  Why did all 4 vaccines rely on the “S” or Spike protein as their only antigen, despite accumulating evidence that multiple segments on it might stimulate autoimmunity?  And despite evidence that the spike protein itself explained some or most of Covid’s toxic effects on human tissues?

4.  Why have government and industry authorized and unleashed 340 different lab tests for Covid in the US, only one of which has been FDA-approved, and none of which are reliably accurate?

5.  Why are government and many experts lying about the fact that recovered people should be vaccinated, when vaccinating them puts them at higher risk of immune adverse reactions?  

6.  Why are government and experts lying to claim that vaccine-induced immunity will be stronger, more robust and long-lasting than natural immunity, when this is an outright falsehood for which there is zero evidence?  Unless they have lied that the mRNA and DNA will be destroyed in hours or a few days, and instead the vaccinated will become long-term Spike factories?

7.  Why do governments and experts contradict the last lie with another lie, which claims that new variants will escape natural and vaccine-induced immunity, so that we can expect more shots every 6-12 months in future, tweaked to the current variants?

8.  Why don’t they tell the truth, that variants with multiple spike mutations can defeat the current vaccines, but are much less likely to defeat natural immunity, which depends on many other immune epitopes, not just the spike.

9.  Why do leaders like Angela Merkel repeat in unison, “[We] will not be able to rest easy until the entire world receives access to ample supplies of vaccines against the coronavirus,  Most of Africa had a tiny fraction of the deaths seen in the Western Hemisphere and Europe. Why do they need supplies of vaccine?  Why do these otherwise heartless leaders want so badly to share their vaccines? 

Why do they flip-flop back and forth about how the vaccines will or won’t protect against virual variants?  For example, the NY Times: As Virus Variants Spread, ‘No One is Safe Until Everyone is Safe.’

Here is more of the same propaganda: Unless we vaccinate the world, we leave the playing field open to more and more mutations, which could churn out variants that could evade our current vaccines and require booster shots to deal with them.” 

—Gregg Gonsalves, Yale University

Well, if we vaccinate the whole world, even children for whom the vaccine is unnecessary, what about all the cats, ferrets, minks and mice that are still susceptible?  There is no possibility of “zero covid” –like the flu, this virus will be with us until it decides to leave.  We cannot disappear it.  Yet the meme persists.

10.  Why, if our world leaders actually cared about saving lives, have they so aggressively suppressed HCQ and ivermectin for early, effective Covid treatment? Note that the EMA advised against ivermectin one week ago, as the FDA did in February–neither actually explaining what evidence they reviewed and how they drew their conclusion. 

11.  Why don’t they tell the truth, that Vitamin D deficiency is a major risk factor for serious illness? And that a few pennies’ worth of oral vitamin D taken weekly or even monthly is probably your best insurance from dying from Covid?  (The UK has started prescribing Vitamin D for high-risk individuals.)

12.  Why are outlets like the Washington Post publishing lies like “Vaccine passports have little to do with international travel ” when several airlines are already trialing them?

13.  Why is it so important to roll out vaccine passports when no standards for them even exist yet, and the privacy issue is a real problem?  They were voted in by the European Parliament one week ago, and have been rolled out in Israel and NY state (the Excelsior pass) for events.

14.  Why do officials claim these passports will be ‘free,’ when the cost to build, provide interoperability and maintain the new systems will be many billions of taxpayer dollars?

15.  Why are the US, Israel and western Europe rushing to duplicate the practices of the Nazis (Your papers please!”)?

16.  Why did FDA permit the vaccine companies to design their clinical trials with loose criteria to identify cases (1 or 2 mild symptoms and a positive PCR test, which used an excessive cycle threshold of 40, leading to false positives)?

17.  Why did FDA then allow the trials to essentially stop as soon as the vaccines received an EUA:  which is when FDA approved the companies’ request to offer vaccine to all the placebo subjects, thus making it impossible to obtain long-term safety data using the placebo group for comparison?

18.  Why has the FDA allowed numerous entities and so-called fact-checking sites to claim the current Covid vaccines, issued under EUA, are “safe and effective” or “approved” when they do not meet either standard, and it is FDA’s responsibility to quash such false claims immediately? 

19. Why, over the past several weeks, have the FDA, the EMA and the WHO issued warning against the use fo ivermectin for Covid, when the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of its considerable benefits? Here is a brief summary of the extensive data (for all the Covid drugs) that can be found at c19study.com:

Early treatment80% [59‑91%]171611,856
Late treatment50% [34‑62%]201466,885
Prophylaxis89% [78‑94%]12777,011
Mortality76% [58‑86%]181557,267
RCTs only70% [54‑80%]262253,686
All studies72% [64‑79%]4938415,752

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stephanie Anderson
Stephanie Anderson
1 year ago

I'm so glad someone else is asking these questions. Thank you so much for your blog.

Dr Chris King
Dr Chris King
1 year ago

As to point 1, recombinant/genetically-modified viral-vector or chimera vaccines have been routinely used for many years in veterinary medicine – in small animals, horses, and farm animal species. They have a long track record of commercial use in animals. Many millions (probably billions) of doses given. There are still subunit vaccines in use and even some inactivated/attenuated whole-virus vaccines, but the viral-vector or chimera vaccines are in widespread use and have been for decades. The mRNA vaccine is entirely new technology, though.

As to the other points, Awomen! This enquiring mind wants to know, too!

Thanks for stating the principal concerns so plainly.

1 year ago

#1 What do we know about the women who became pregnant during the Pfizer trials? Is there follow up? I can't find it…. "Initial clinical trials didn’t include pregnant women. However, 23 women became pregnant during the Pfizer-BioNTech trial. Some were given the vaccine, others were given a placebo. Those participants are being followed to see how the vaccine may have affected their pregnancies."https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/verify/verify-no-link-between-infertility-or-miscarriage-and-covid-19-vaccine/283-54b01931-09e8-4852-a11c-3718baf55fdf

#2 AND what about the women who so "excitedly" volunteered to take the vaccine while pregnant? (were they paid? did they sign NDA's? did they agree not to
sue for damages if they miscarried? )What do we know about them? I cannot find any more info on Caitlyn Ott….https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/data-pregnancy-covid-vaccine-sparse-these-women-are-changing-n1258874

#3 Is information about miscarriages after vaccination being suppressed? (I have several anecdotal stories such as the one Dr Ryan Cole of Cole Diagnostics in Idaho has related…)

1 year ago

And why are the clinical trials for ivermectin using patients admitted to the hospital instead of EARLY intervention trials? Anecdotal evidence suggests EARLY intervention works. NOT after they are already in the hospital….
"Time to cure is evaluated by measuring time from admission of the patient to the hospital…"https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04343092

1 year ago

Why did FDA then allow the trials to essentially stop as soon as the vaccines received an EUA:

This is huge and indicates malfeasance on a grand scale. Inexplicable.

1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

FDA has become a criminal and captured entity, now akin to the FBI, CIA, DOJ, DOE & SEC. Today, sadly, we can also include the SCOTUS – cowards in the face of obvious fraud.


1 year ago

Three more Whys:

Why is there is such shaming to take a vaccine when if the vaccine is any good, the choice not to take it only puts the one who declines at risk?

Why has the WHO today decided to recommend against Ivermectin?

For what reason has the narrative shifted to "lab leak possible." Dramatic shift in last few days…

1 year ago

I hadn’t heard that about Ivermectin. Incredible and transparent corruption! Imagine what it takes for someone who calls themselves a medical professional to 1) not bother to look at research at all but just swallow whatever the CDC says, and 2) once they read the research, to ignore it or deny it, when it clearly shows a huge benefit for survival.

When will the Governors pay any price at all for having *killed* many elderly patients by sending them back to the nursing homes while infected, and why did only Democrat Governors do that?

They are only keeping a lid on this unprecedented mass human experimentation (since Nazi Germany, Tuskegee, etc.) with their total control of media – “news” and social media – using censorship so aggressive they are destroying their own platforms.

Will SCOTUS wake up and do something about social media’s ability to censor doctors? Justice Thomas just spoke out following the latest opportunity with a case dismissal on the issue of censorship – “We will soon have no choice but to address how our legal doctrines apply to highly concentrated, privately owned information infrastructure such as digital platforms.” [https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/supreme-court-throws-out-lawsuit-over-trump-blocking-critics-on-twitter_3762613.html]

Last edited 1 year ago by Reader21
Scroll to Top